Perkembangan dan Inovasi Teknologi Reproduksi Ternak untuk Percepatan Peningkatan Genetik

Aminurrahman Aminurrahman; Enny Yuliani; Lukman HY; Rezki Amalyadi; Ine Karni; Luluk Lailatun Nurjanah; Khairil Anwar; Ryan Aryadin Putra; Sadarman Sadarman

doi:10.36423/baar.v8i2.3298

Authors

Aminurrahman Aminurrahman University of Mataram
Enny Yuliani Universitas Mataram
Lukman HY Universitas Mataram
Rezki Amalyadi University of Mataram
Ine Karni University of Mataram
Luluk Lailatun Nurjanah University of Mataram
Khairil Anwar University of Mataram
Ryan Aryadin Putra University of Mataram
Sadarman Sadarman Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36423/baar.v8i2.3298

Abstract

Livestock reproductive technology has advanced from conventional methods toward integrated systems combining Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART), genomic selection, in vitro embryo production, and digital innovations. This integration can boost genetic efficiency by raising selection intensity, speeding up reproduction of superior stock, and shortening generation intervals. This study uses a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Data were gathered from Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed, covering publications from 2020 to 2025. After applying defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and thematic synthesis, 189 initial records were screened: 43 duplicates removed, 146 assessed, and 32 selected for final analysis. Five core themes emerged: optimization of gamete and embryo quality, genomic selection integration, genetic multiplication via AI, ET and IVEP, cryopreservation and biosafety, plus digitalization and artificial intelligence. Technologies such as artificial insemination, embryo transfer and IVEP help increase genetic gain by maximizing offspring output from superior individuals. Combining genomic selection with embryo tools allows early identification of animals or embryos with high genetic potential. However, adoption remains limited by biological barriers, technical challenges, high costs, infrastructure gaps, biosecurity concerns, regulations, and user acceptance. Merging reproductive technologies with genomic selection, data management and artificial intelligence offers a powerful path to accelerate livestock genetic improvement. Successful implementation demands an integrated, precise and context-adaptive strategy, while carefully balancing biological, economic, social and sustainability aspects.

References

Aguila, L., Treulen, F., Therrien, J., Felmer, R., Valdivia, M., & Smith, L. C. (2020). Oocyte selection for in vitro embryo production in bovine species: noninvasive approaches for new challenges of oocyte competence. Animals, 10(12), 2196.

Amaral, T. F., de Grazia, J. G. V., Martinhao, L. A. G., De Col, F., Siqueira, L. G. B., Viana, J. H. M., & Hansen, P. J. (2022). Actions of CSF2 and DKK1 on bovine embryo development and pregnancy outcomes are affected by composition of embryo culture medium. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 7503.

Bangert, E. A., & Wheeler, M. B. (2025). Assisted reproductive technologies and genetic improvement strategies for enhancing livestock production and food security in Tropical East Africa : A review. 9, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.25081/jsa.2025.v9.9599

Cole, J. B., Dürr, J. W., & Nicolazzi, E. L. (2021). Invited review: The future of selection decisions and breeding programs: What are we breeding for, and who decides? Journal of Dairy Science, 104(5), 5111–5124.

Crowe, A. D., Lonergan, P., & Butler, S. T. (2021). Invited review: Use of assisted reproduction techniques to accelerate genetic gain and increase value of beef production in dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(12), 12189–12206.

Fao, F. (2018). Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Rome, URL: Http://Faostat. Fao. Org, 403.

Fischer, K., & Schnieke, A. (2023). How genome editing changed the world of large animal research. Frontiers in Genome Editing, 5, 1272687.

Fujii, T., Naito, A., Moriyasu, S., & Kageyama, S. (2021). Potential of preimplantation genomic selection using the blastomere separation technique in bovine in vitro fertilized embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 67(2), 155–159.

Funnell, B., Briand-Amirat, L., Viana, J. H. M., & Perry, G. (2024). Disease risk of in vitro produced embryos: A review of current commercial practices in the context of international trade with emphasis on bovine embryos. Theriogenology, 230, 212–219.

Gebreyesus, G., Secher, J. B., Lund, M. S., Kupisiewicz, K., Ivask, M., Hallap, T., Pärn, P., & Su, G. (2024). Genetic parameters for bull effects on in vitro embryo production (IVP) and relationship between semen quality traits and IVP performance. Animal Reproduction Science, 263, 107436.

Giordano, J. O., Sitko, E. M., Rial, C., Pérez, M. M., & Granados, G. E. (2022). Symposium review: Use of multiple biological, management, and performance data for the design of targeted reproductive management strategies for dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 105(5), 4669–4678.

González-Rodríguez, N., Martínez-Rodero, I., Scherzer, J., Jung, S., Reichenbach, M., Zablotski, Y., Otzdorff, C., Zerbe, H., & Mogas, T. (2022). Vitrification and in-straw warming do not affect pregnancy rates of biopsied bovine embryos. Theriogenology, 191, 221–230.

Gore, D. L. M., Okeno, T. O., Muasya, T. K., & Mburu, J. N. (2021). Improved response to selection in dairy goat breeding programme through reproductive technology and genomic selection in the tropics. Small Ruminant Research, 200, 106397.

Hansen, P. J. (2023). Some challenges and unrealized opportunities toward widespread use of the in vitro-produced embryo in cattle production. Animal, 17, 100745.

Hansen, P. J. (2024). Pressing needs and recent advances to enhance production of embryos in vitro in cattle. Animal Reproduction, 21(3), e20240036.

Idrissi, S. J., Slezec-Frick, V., Le Bourhis, D., Le Berre, L., Joly, T., Buff, S., Desmarchais, A., Schibler, L., Salvetti, P., & Elis, S. (2022). Effect of DHA on the quality of In vitro produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology, 187, 102–111.

Júnior, G. A. F., Peripolli, E., Schmidt, P. I., Campos, G. S., Mota, L. F. M., Mercadante, M. E. Z., Baldi, F., Carvalheiro, R., & de Albuquerque, L. G. (2022). Current applications and perspectives of genomic selection in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle. Livestock Science, 263, 105001.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.

Kondrup, S. (2021). Research results. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(7), 8023–8038.

Krisher, R. L., & Herrick, J. R. (2024). Bovine embryo production in vitro: evolution of culture media and commercial perspectives. Animal Reproduction, 21(3), e20240051.

Madureira, A. M. L., Denis-Robichaud, J., Guida, T. G., Cerri, R. L. A., & Vasconcelos, J. L. M. (2022). Association between genomic daughter pregnancy rates and reproductive parameters in Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 105(6), 5534–5543.

Mansour, H. A. E.-H. (2025). Integration of assisted reproductive technologies and artificial intelligence for optimizing fertility and genetic selection in livestock production. Discover Applied Sciences, 7(10), 1143.

Menchon, P., Manning, J. K., Swain, D. L., & Cosby, A. (2024). Exploration of extension research to promote genetic improvement in cattle production: systematic review. Animals, 14(2), 231.

Miller, S. (2022). Genomic selection in beef cattle creates additional opportunities for embryo technologies to meet industry needs. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 35(2), 98–105.