Increasing Broiler Business with a Strategy Without AGP in People's Farms Based on Production Aspects and Economic Aspects

Authors

  • Bambang Rijanto Japutra Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Purwokerto
  • Ismoyowati Ismoyowati Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Novie Andri Setianto Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Muhammad Rayhan Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Purwokerto
  • Arif Harnowo Sidhi Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Purwokerto
  • Novita Hindratiningrum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36423/baar.v6i2.1930

Abstract

This study examines the improvement of broiler chickens using AGP and without AGP aims to determine the difference between the use and removal of antibiotic growth promoter (AGP) in broiler chicken feed based on production aspects (feed efficiency and cumulative performance index), economic aspects (business capacity and income), socio-demographic aspects (breeder education, age of breeder, duration of breeding and motivation to raise livestock), analyzing various factors and their relationship in broiler farming in Banyumas district, Pemalang district, Temanggung district, and Banjarnegara district, Central Java province. This research was conducted using a survey method on broiler breeders who joined a partnership company. Data analysis consisted of analysis of variance based on GLM (general linear model). The results of the phase 1 study showed that there were differences in production aspects (EFF and IPK) in different years, districts, and business scales, but the use and elimination of AGP on feed efficiency and cumulative performance index showed no significant differences. Broiler production was better in 2018 with the elimination of AGP than in 2017 when using AGP in the manufacturer's feed. Based on the economic aspect, the use and elimination of AGP have no significant effect on business capacity and income. Scientifically, it is necessary to carry out further research and development of quantitative models. The implications of efforts to improve the broiler farming business system on smallholder farms include: 1) breeders have land and cages with minimal quality, namely semi-closed houses, 2) partnership companies partner with farmers who have livestock education background, 3) improve maintenance management based on quality. SAPRONAK used. Therefore, in the development of the broiler farming business, it is necessary for the Government to also pay attention to the regulatory system and arrangement of the broiler marketing trade system as an effort to increase the productivity of the broiler farming business.

References

Allama, H., O. Sofyan., E. Widodo dan H. S. Prayogi. 2012. Pengaruh Penggunaan Tepung Ulat Kandang (Alphitobius diaperinus) dalam Pakan terhadap Penampilan Produksi Ayam Pedaging. Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Peternakan. 22(3): 1-8.

Andri, R. Wati, dan A. Suresti. 2011. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pendapatan Peternak Ayam Ras Petelur di Kecamatan Lareh Sago Halaban Kabupaten Lima 50 Kota. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia. 13(3): 205-214.

Armelia, V., D. M. Saleh and N. A. Setianto. 2018. Identification of Factors Contributed to Beef Cattle Reproductive Disorders in Ogan Komering Ulu Timur Regency (OKU Timur) of South Sumatra Province in UPSUS SIWAB Program 2018. Animal Production. 20(3):199-209.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2024. Populasi Ayam Broiler Berdasarkan Provinsi.

Bajagai, Y. S., A.V. Klieve., P.J. Dart., W.L. Bryden. 201 6. Probiotics in Animal Nutrition-Production, Impact and Regulation. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 179, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, Rome, Italy (2016), pp. 5-22.

Cervantes, H. M. 2012. The Future of Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry Production. World´s Poultry Congress. 1-16.

Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. 2018. Statistik Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan 2018. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian RI.

Fitriza, Y.T., Haryadi, F.T. dan Syahlani, S.P. 2012. Analisis Pendapatan dan Persepsi Peternak Plasma Terhadap Kontrak Perjanjian Pola Kemitraan Ayam Pedaging di Propinsi Lampung. Buletin Peternakan. 36(1): 57-65.

Gao, P., C. Ma., Z. Sun., L. Wang., S. Huang., X. Su., J. Xu and H. Zamg. 2017. Feed-Additive Probiotics Accelerate Yet Antibiotics Delay Intestinal Microbiota Maturation in Broiler Chicken. Microbiome. 5, 91 (2017).

Hill, C., F. Guarner., G. Reid., G. R. Gibson., D. J. Merenstein and B. Pot. 2014. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics Consensus Statement on the Scope and Appropriate Use of the Termprobiotic. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 11(8): 506-514.

Kumalasari, C., I. Setiawan and L. Adriani. 2020. Effect of Dried Probiotics Based Cow’s Milk, Mung Bean, and Soybean on Growth Performance Broiler Chicken. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia. 22 (1): 110-118.

Pramu., Y. R. Kusuma., T. Susilo., N. Abdulloh and M. M. Agsung. 2019. Utilization of Virgin Coconut Oil (Vco) as an Alternative Replacement Of Antibiotic Growth Promoters (Agp) in Poultry Feed. Jurnal Penelitian Peternakan Terpadu. 1 (1): 52-57.

Sawadi, M., H. Hafid., L. A Nafiu. 2016. Pengaruh Bobot Potong dan Pakan Komersial terhadap Pertumbuhan Ayam Broiler. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis. 3(3): 47-56.

Schiassi L., Y. Junior., F. A. Damasceno., J. A. O. Saraz., A. G. Amaral. 2014. Thermal-Acoustic Comfort Index for Workers of Poultry Houses Using Fuzzy Modeling. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. 4(9):60-64.

Shini, S., D. Zhang., R. C. Aland., X. Li., P. J. Dart., M. J. Callaghan., R. E. Speight., W. L. Bryden. 2020. Probiotic Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens H57 Ameliorates Subclinical Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chicks By Maintaining Intestinal Mucosal Integrity and Improving Feed Efficiency. Poultry Science. 99(9): 4278-4293.

Siegel. P. B. 2014. Evolution of the Modern Broiler and Feed Efficiency. Journal Animal Biosci. 2014. 2:375–85.

Sinurat, A. P., S. Bahri., S. Muharsini., W. Puastuti., A. Priyanti., I. S. Nurhayati dan Priyono. 2017. Kebijakan Pengendalian Penggunaan Antibiotic Growth Promoters dan Ractopamine dalam Mendukung Keamanan Pangan Nasional. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan. Bogor.

Skvortsova, L. N., A. G. Koshchaev., V. I. Shcherbatov., Y. A. Lysenko., V. I. Fisinin., I. P. Saleeva., S. F. Sukhanova. 2018. The Use of Probiotics for Improving the Biological Potential of Broiler Chickens. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 10(4): 760-765.

Sudrajat dan A. Y. Isyanto. 2018. Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Pendapatan Usaha Ternak Ayam Sentuldi Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis. 4(1): 70-83.

Sumarno, Woli, Y., dan Supartini, N., 2022. Study Of Broiler Production Performance In Closed House And Open House Cage Systems. Jurnal Agriekstensia. 21(1): 42-50.

Timbermont, L., F. Haesebrouck., R. Ducatelle., F. V. Immerseel. 2011. Necrotic Enteritis In Broilers: An Updated Review On The Pathogenesis. Avian Pathol 40 (2011), pp. 341-347.

Zuidhof, M. J., B. L. Scheider., V. L. Carney., D. R. Korver, and F. E. Robinson. 2014. Growth, Efficiency and Yield of Commercial Broilers From 1957, 1978 and 2005. Poultry Science.93(12):2970-82.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-03

How to Cite

Rijanto Japutra, B., Ismoyowati, I., Andri Setianto, N., Rayhan, M., Harnowo Sidhi, A., & Hindratiningrum, N. (2024). Increasing Broiler Business with a Strategy Without AGP in People’s Farms Based on Production Aspects and Economic Aspects. Bulletin of Applied Animal Research, 6(2), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.36423/baar.v6i2.1930